British and EU students can consider themselves lucky. Coming to university is difficult in many ways. Problems might include the difficulty of getting through application forms, admission into university and sorting out personal finances. All of these problems are universal to all students. No government, however, is placing additional barriers in their ways to gaining a degree in higher education in Britain. This on the other hand is a major problem for overseas international students.
Most students will have heard about the recent changes to the immigration policy, especially the introduction of the Points Based Immigration Systems (PBS). For those of you that haven't, PBS was introduced to streamline the process of issuing visas to hopeful overseas individuals who wish to come to Britain. Although not primarily aimed at international students, this has had a massive effect on all overseas students wishing to come to Britain for study.
A significant number of overseas students have had their visa application delayed and, because of this, missed out on the first weeks of term. This has proved to be damaging to their efforts to integrate and settle into university life. It has also caused problems for institutions, such as the University of Sheffield, that have had to offer additional support including special catch-up sessions and seminars for all students on delayed visas.
Many other students have had to deal with the complicated bureaucratic nonsense that needs to be overcome before being granted a visa. University and Students' Union support staff have to stay on top of immigration rules which appear to change frequently and without warning or proper consultation.
On November 12th, Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced a review of Tier 4, the student branch of the new immigration system. However, instead of reducing the complications of an application, the review is being conducted alongside the wrong principles. Some of these principles are nonsensical at best and downright discriminatory at their worst.
One of the questions the review is set to look at, is proposing to increase the minimum level of English students have to demonstrate before starting a course. Whilst this appears to be a sound recommendation, it is not universally applicable. For students wishing to come to Britain to study English, this is an unnecessary precondition that they should not have to overcome. If these students wish to improve their English skills, they ought to be able to do it in an English-speaking environment, rather than having to acquire more advanced levels of English in their home country first.
Another is looking at whether overseas students should have their rights to work in Britain during their period of study curtailed. Given the incredibly high rate of fees for international students at some institutions, limiting their ability to gain some money on the side is not a welcome move. Furthermore, the home office does not appear to distinguish between paid work and volunteer work (or indeed Student Union involvement). Curtailing overseas students' ability to volunteer in the local community or stopping them from having their voice heard in the Students' Union and home institution goes against everything we as a Students' Union are trying to achieve.
Furthermore, it is suggested that students on foundation courses should have to return to their home country to re-apply for a visa, should they want to progress to study for a full degree in Britain. The cost and effort this would put on students is enormous, given that for many students it is already too expensive or difficult to return to their families over the holiday periods.
The last principle that will be mentioned here, concerns the proposal to treat countries which have "historically been sources of illegal migration" differently from others. This would see the home office raising minimum levels of qualification and introducing stricter tests for individuals from such "higher risk countries". If Gordon Brown truly believes in his vision of a fair society, he should apply his values to the treatment of international overseas students. It is not fair to students from these countries to be treated differently from any other and this principle should be opposed by Students' Unions across the country and institutions alike.
In light of these proposed principles, English UK have offered a response to the review which can be seen
here. They have also started a petition on
this website, which your Sabbs have signed. We would urge all of you that value the presence of international students at our institution to sign it as well. This is not the time to take international students for granted as we are standing at the crossroads right now.
Both the Sabbatical Team and your Union Council have voted to oppose the principles underlying this review and we will do everything in our power to have our voices heard. It is only when the British government shifts its attitude towards international students that we will see a change in government policy.
Apart from their obvious financial benefits to the British economy, overseas students bring so many benefits to our society that seeing a loss of student numbers would be detrimental to all of our university experience. Without them we would not be able to gain cultural agility, an international experience and lose friendships that might last a lifetime.
Do not let this review come to the wrong conclusions.
Please let me know what your thoughts are. My email is alex.erdlenbruch@sheffield.ac.uk
Thanks a lot!