Critical appraisal and using the literature

Previous - Evaluating Websites  Next - Self assessment

 

RESOURCES FOR CRITICAL APPRAISAL

 

Critical Appraisal of Bio-medical Literature, on-line tutorial from the Wisdom Centre:

http://www.wisdom.org.uk/ebpsem2.html

How to read a paper

A very readable and practical series, originally published in the British Medical Journal and edited by Trisha Greenhalgh. Also now available as a book from BMJ Publishing Group:

The Medline database, BMJ 1997;315:180-183 (19 July)

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7101/180

Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about) BMJ 1997;315:243-246 (26 July) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7102/243

Assessing the methodological quality of published papers BMJ 1997;315 (2 August)

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7103/305

Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests BMJ 1997;315:364-366 (9 August) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7104/364

Statistics for the non-statistician. II: "Significant" relations and their pitfalls BMJ 1997;315:422-425 (16 Aug) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7105/422

Papers that report drug trials BMJ 1997;315:480-483 (23 August) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7106/480

Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests BMJ 1997;315:540-543 (30 August) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7107/540

Papers that tell you what things cost (economic analyses) BMJ 1997;315:596-599 (6 Sept) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7108/596

Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) BMJ 1997;315:672-675 (13 Sept) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7109/672

Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) BMJ 1997;315:740-743 (20 September) http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/315/7110/740

 

Appendix - Users' Guides to the Medical Literature

A very good set of guides to using the literature were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) a few years ago and are now available on the Web with clinical scenarios and worked examples of question answering at: http://www.cche.net/principles/content_all.asp

Each includes a check list of questions to use in critical appraisal, and some also include advice about the best Medline search strategy. In detail they cover:

Therapy and prevention http://www.cche.net/principles/content_therapy.asp

Diagnosis http://www.cche.net/principles/content_diagnosis.asp

Harm http://www.cche.net/principles/content_harm.asp

Prognosis http://www.cche.net/principles/content_prognosis.asp

Overview articles http://www.cche.net/principles/content_overview.asp

Clinical decision analyses http://www.cche.net/principles/content_d_analysis.asp

Clinical practice guidelines http://www.cche.net/principles/content_p_guideline.asp

Clinical utilization reviews* http://www.cche.net/principles/content_u_review.asp

Outcomes of health service research: http://www.cche.net/principles/content_v_outcome.asp

Quality of life measures http://www.cche.net/principles/content_qol.asp

Economic analyses http://www.cche.net/principles/content_e_analysis.asp

Grading Healthcare Recommendations http://www.cche.net/principles/content_grading.asp

Applicability of clinical trials results http://www.cche.net/principles/content_results.asp

Probability for different diagnoses http://www.cche.net/principles/content_d_probability.asp

(*basically write ups of clinical audit projects)

The hard copy references for the JAMA series are:

The Evidence Based Medicine Tool Kit, basically a simpler version of the Users’ Guides

http://www.med.ualberta.ca/ebm/ebm.htm

 

Next - Self assessment