Appraising an Information Needs Analysis

12 questions to help you make sense of an information needs analysis/information audit

 

General comments

Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising an information needs analysis:

 

A/ To what extent is the study a close representation of the "truth" (validity)?

B/ Are the results credible and repeatable (reliability)?

C/ Will the results help me in my own information practice (applicability)?

 

 

A/ Is the study a close representation of the truth?

Screening Questions

1. Does the study address a clearly focused issue?

 

 

 

HINT: An issue can be "focused" in terms of :

·        The population (potential user group) studied

·        The definition used for "information"

·        The methods for assigning preferences or weightings

Yes

Can't Tell

No

 

 

 

2. Does the study position itself in the context of other studies?

 

HINT: Consider whether the study:

·        Refers to other studies that have looked at the same user group

·        Utilises a methodology that has been used in previous user studies

Yes

Can't Tell

No

 

 

3. Is there a direct comparison that provides an additional frame of reference?

 

HINT: This may either be external :

e.g. contrast with, or similarity to, other studies

Yes

Can't Tell

No

 

Or internal:

e.g. contrast with, or similarity to, other user

groups within the study

e.g. contrast with, or similarity to, the same

group at different geographical locations or at

a different time period.

Is it worth continuing?

 

 

           

Detailed Questions

4. Were those involved in collection of data also involved in delivering a service to the user group[1]?

HINT : It may not always be possible to separate researchers from service deliverers but consider has the service deliverers' perspective been acknowledged explicitly and to what extent have the questions in the user study been generated elsewhere (e.g. a previously trialled or validated instrument or from a focus group) 

Yes

Can't Tell

No

 

5. Were the methods used in acquiring data on information needs appropriate and clearly described?

HINT: Has a variety of written and oral, formal and informal sources been used? Has an attempt been made to triangulate findings across a range of sources? Has a range of methods been used to acquire data e.g interview, focus group, questionnaire, observation etceteras? How have respondents been identified?

Yes

Can't Tell

No

 

6. Was the planned sample of users representative of all users (actual and eligible) who might be included in the study?

HINT: Do the demographics of the sample (e.g. age, sex, staff grade, location) accurately reflect the demographics of the total population? Are any interests or motivations behind participation clearly identified? Are non-users included in the sampling frame?

Yes

Can't Tell

No

 

 B/ Are the results credible and repeatable?

 7. What was the response rate and how representative was it of the population under study?

HINT: Consider not only the actual percentage of responses but also whether any specific subgroups were either over-represented or under-represented. Are reasons for non-response discussed? Have non-users been included in the analysis of responses?[2]

 

8. Are the results complete and have they been analysed in an easily interpretable way?

HINT: Consider choices involved in analysis and in presentation. Have all variables identified earlier in the paper been analysed[3]? If not, why not?

Yes

Can't Tell

No

9. What attempts have been made to ensure reliability of responses? 

HINT: Consider whether a single interviewer/team of interviewers was used. Was training offered? What mechanisms were used to ensure consistency of coding between interviewers? What relationship did interviewers have with interviewees? What opportunities were there for interviewer bias?

Yes

Can't Tell

No


 

C. Will the results help me in my own information practice

 10. Can the results be applied to your local population?

HINT: The burden of proof is on you to identify any ways in which your local population might differ from that in the study. Are there differences in the context (political, environmental or organizational) of the study?

Yes

Can't Tell

No

 

If NO, are you able to use the same methodology (if valid) with your local population?

 

Yes

Can't Tell

No

11. What are the implications of the study for your practice?

In terms of current deployment of services?:

 

 

 

In terms of cost?:  

 

 

 

In terms of the expectations or attitudes of your users?:

 

 

 

12. What additional information do you need to obtain locally to assist you in responding to the findings of this study?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] Cp. Greenhalgh. What was the researcher's perspective and has this been taken into account?

[2] Cp. Intention to treat analysis.

[3] Cp. Accounting for withdrawals and drop outs. Data on how the user group is similar to other groups is also useful in planning services.